For the better part of two years, the US and other Western democratic nations have supported Ukraine based on moral and strategic arguments. The moral obligation stems from defending an emerging democracy suffering from an illegal invasion by Russia. The strategic imperative is to prevent further Russian aggression, which could lead to an invasion of other European countries or encourage other aggressor states like China. However, these arguments are increasingly ineffective in convincing skeptics.
Instead of relying on theoretical possibilities, US leaders should frame aiding Ukraine as an investment rather than simply assistance. By highlighting the direct benefits of aiding Ukraine, such as degrading Russia’s armed forces and strengthening the US defense industrial base, support for Ukraine can be bolstered. The cost of aiding Ukraine is relatively low, with significant returns on investment in terms of national security and military capabilities.
A substantial portion of aid dollars allocated to Ukraine remain in the US, benefiting American defense contractors and creating thousands of jobs in manufacturing facilities across the country. Continued US aid to Ukraine is crucial in achieving a favorable end to the ongoing conflict, as President Putin bets on Moscow’s ability to outlast Ukraine and its allies. By reframing aid to Kyiv as a worthy investment, public support for Ukraine can be maintained and strengthened.
